Should we talk about the caste system in India? I think so. Why? Because it exists - and I don't see a need for why it should be there in the 21st century.
Many Indians try to explain away or shrug off, when asked about the caste system.
For those who want to have an idea of caste, check out the following link - I think it does a fairly good job at describing the concept, and its possible origin in the past:
Religion in India - Caste System
However, I am fully convinced, that if there is one feature of the Indian society that has weakened it immensely, it is the caste system. I am not talking merely about the discrimination, because, discrimination in one form or another, exists in several societies. I am talking about how the existence of caste system has made Indians underachievers, despite a rather glorious past...
Caste system is not merely a division of labour - as some clever folks try to explain. There is a clear hierarchy - perhaps dating back all the way to the Rig Veda, where the classification of society is mentioned. I am least interested in whether this was correct or not, IN THOSE DAYS - because I have no clue as to how things where back then (and I suppose, most folks wouldn't have any clue, either). But the fact is that these classifications, in the course of time, became more firmly established into hundreds (if not thousands) of divisions. Obviously we did not have hundreds of well-defined professions, did we? So, the argument that caste is just for the convenience of social organization or division of labour doesn't wash.
It's not just the hierarchy that has ruined the society - but, more importantly, the fact that this was based on birth! So, a brahmin kid, who could be having a less than average IQ and other skills, would still be placed above a shudra (lower caste) kid of the same age, but who might be having better skills. But here's the catch - the brahmin kids were never tested against the shudra kids, because they didn't go to school together. In fact, formal education (even if it was limited to learning the scriptures and rituals), was strictly limited to the upper castes.
Despite these restrictions, the professionals (I mean the "real" professionals, namely, the farmers, masons, carpenters, metal workers, etc.) did carry on their traditional work, making whatever improvements in their skills, along the way....but the hierarchy remained. Thus, even though a grand temple (thousands of these temples have survived destruction by invading barbarians) was built with money and management by the rich guys (usually the local king), with the design made by the sculptors (not the brahmins, but the builders and sculptors - who knew what kind of dimensions for the arches and the beams and the pillars would be acceptable, based on the available materials and building techniques), and hundreds of labourers would work to complete the temple, finally, it was the priestly class who would decide who could enter the temple and who could not. This situation changed only long after the British arrived in India. The credit goes, not to the British, but to those activists and leaders who suddenly saw all that was wrong and unacceptable in society, and who fought for and demanded equality.
Temple entry was just one example. But, on a day-to-day level, there was (and even today, there still is) no genuine feeling of community, EVEN when faced by external threats and aggression! This, in my opinion, was the single biggest factor that allowed for external aggression and invasion to take place. Because, the upper caste people made sure that the lower caste folks did not have much of a stake in the running of the society...And the upper caste folks, when faced with complete defeat, more often than not, actually started working for the conqueror - as can be seen in the civil services of the Mughals, and, later on, the British. In fact, during the British rule, a lot of brahmins actually took pride in being fluent in the English language, and for passing the various examinations for jobs that were essentially clerical! And when the British left India, these same brahmins were quick to occupy all the top posts in the Indian bureaucracy.
This wouldn't have been bad in itself, but for the enormous and debilitating monopoly that was, and still is, continuing...severely curtailing and entrepreneurial effort. But the blame goes to Jawaharlal Nehru for this socialist mess. Nobody talks about the role of the bureaucrats in slowing down India's development.
Utterly unqualified chaps were running the railways and the telephones...Nobody questions their qualifications. The railway chaps take pride in the fact that Indian railways is the largest, in terms of route-km, and also happens to be the largest employer in India. But they don't mention the fact that when the British left India, there were about 50,000 route-km in India, whereas, today, it's about 63,000 route-km. More important is the fact that Indian railways celebrated 150 years, a few years ago. Which shows that railways were introduced in India soon after the technology became available even in Europe. I am not for a moment saying that the British did it for any charitable purposes - obviously they did it for their own benefit. But the fact remains that the railways were introduced where none existed. This was a humongous task, considering that, following extensive land survey, land had to be acquired, rail tracks manufactured, transported and laid, stations and signalling systems put in place, etc. If an occupying force could accomplish so much, what prevented the Indians from expanding and modernizing Indian railways to world class? In my opinion, what prevented was the lack of energy - from top to bottom. Today, even a simple task of connecting to existing railway lines (such as the Chennai Central with Egmore) is considered tough, and takes years (if not decades) to be completed! What a shame!
The chaps sitting at the top are just content to hold on to their seats, get their promotions, enjoy the perks, ensuring a pension, etc. Seeing the top bureaucrats enjoying more than what they deserve, obviously the lower rank employees would do only so much... after all, it's the top chaps who are supposed to look at the big picture, make projections, take up challenging projects, and make sure they are completed. They didn't, and they couldn't do all these - because they are simply not qualified, they are NOT world class professionals!
But nobody noticed this, because it was all too convenient to blame the politicians - who were a dirty, rotten lot, anyway... but the fact remains that while politicians come and go, it's the bureaucrats who stay on forever...And, I am fully convinced that the prevailing mindset in the Indian bureaucracy is a carry-over from the casteist mentality. Creativity, taking up challenging tasks and completing them, work ethics, etc., are not as important, compared to hierarchy, sychophantism, etc., which leads to mediocrity...
While I may not be laying out in detail and in an organized way, I am convinced that caste has to go, before it's too late. Caste corrupts the minds - it dulls the senses, people lose sense of the big picture about what's happening around them... and what have we got to lose by throwing away this stupid system?
Oh, one more thing - while the brahmins sit at the top of the hierarchy, it is by no means that this evil practice is limited to the Brahmins alone. The cruel joke and the irony is that it is zealously practised by all the people who are at various levels of this hierarchy. The situation is so stupid and so dangerous, that we have incidents where people from communities that are already bracketed as "backward"or "most backward", beat up folks from communities that are ranked even below - such as the Dalits (formerly called as "untouchables", and officially called Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes). Just walk through any college campus, or any government office...At the very least, you can see a condenscending behaviour towards those who have made it into the colleges or government jobs based on some reservation (the Indian version of "affirmative action").
I have personally seen at a high-level meeting in New Delhi, there was this professor making a comment about someone being a "neo-Buddhist". When some of the people at the meeting did not understand what he meant, he said, "oh, just like our President is a neo-Buddhist". It turned out that he was referring to someone as coming from a lower (untouchable) caste, just like the President of that time (K. R. Narayanan), since several of these folks had converted to Buddhism as a protest against the caste-based discrimination. I had no doubt that the person who made this comment (who was a Professor at a prestigeous University) was clearly prejudiced, despite his education and his scientific "achievements".
Though it can be argued that the caste system has nothing to do with Hinduism, and it's only a social practice, and not a religous feature, the fact remains that most Hindus have not denounced this practice. It shows that either their brand of religion has not helped them to see things as they are, or, worse, they actually stand to benefit from this hierarchy - either way, it shows that Hindu society needs a major overhaul for the inherent beauty and spirituality to blossom...As a first step, caste has to go! I know it would be difficult to give up these concepts - so much sentimentality would be attached to these - and, a lot of times, people derive their identity from their castes - especially those in the "upper" castes - so I can understand why they wouldn't want to give up the goodies! I'll tell you why you have to give it up - especially to the youngsters, and even more importantly, to those youngsters who are not married - throw away your caste identity, try to reach for excellence in whatever you do (even if you don't necessarily become world famous, you can try to be the best you can be, always, and in every undertaking - from the mundane everyday chores to special tasks, show that you care for excellence) - throw away a worthless and imaginary identity. Don't hide behind false notions of superiority - India is not yet a developed nation. We have miles to go. Along the way, we need to make sure that everyone has enough to eat, a decent place to live, has adequate water and sanitation facilities, and most imporantly, is able to live a life of dignity, no matter what profession one is engaged in... And caste system is not going to help in any way! The world will respect India for what it is, collectively - a foreigner is least bothered if you are a Brahmin or a Shudra, and any foreigner visiting and traveling in India can see for himself/herself about our efficiency, cleanliness, orderliness, politeness, etc. It is possible to have a dignified and self-assured society, even if most people do not speak English. On the other hand, what we have is a society where there are a significant number of English-speaking, so-called educated people, but the society as a whole, is chaotic, unruly, and, unfortunately, corrupt...
If your parents and relatives come in the way, try to convince your parents that there's no need to hold on to these caste divisions, don't worry too much about the relatives - they will come around, once they see your real worth as a person...Live a dignified life, and make sure you let others live a dignified life, as well...
There is enough noise, I mean, news, on the so-called OBC Reservation issue...
Indian Express Full Coverage > OBC Reservation
Rediff.com The Reservation Issue
What I find interesting is the way arguments are put-forth by the anti-reservation camp...while some of their points do carry 'merit' (hmm..! merit, yes...), I find a lot of their arguments and the way articles are written to be cunning and manipulative, baring a rage against and contempt for the so-called lower-caste people. As in cases of discrimination, the arguments have been extremely simplified - so much so that it's implied that merit=upper caste and reservation=mediocrity.
I don't support a blind implementation of any percentage of reservation...I find the hypocrisy and the opportunism of some in the so-called OBC camp ridiculous and outrageous. And I would like some of the criminals in the OBC category who actually terrorise those belonging to the SC/ST category to be prosecuted - this would be the height of stupidity and absurdity, if not for the violence that is often involved...I am certainly pissed off with the way Arjun Singh is going about in this matter...I have never really trusted him, anyway - from the days of his constant and completely unwarranted needling of P.V. Narasimha Rao...But I have to give it to him for standing up to the 'protesters'...against whom some valid questions have been asked...
The other side of merit & Mandal II
What more do the upper castes want?
I cannot possibly hope to compete against the mighty voices opposing the 'quota'. (For the record, I don't support it blindly, either.) But the sheer variety of arguments against the quota issue is amazing, if not scary. Consider this from RSS chief K S Sudershan:
‘Quotas an attempt to divide Hindus’
Indian Express - online: Thursday, June 08, 2006
I am reproducing verbatim, a portion from this story:
*****************************
‘‘Even some Brahmins are economically disadvantaged. Quota should be given on economic basis too,’’ he said.
‘‘Give opportunities, but incapable people coming to the fore will affect our national skills and efficiency,’’ he said expressing concern that nobody was worried about the development.
*****************************
Now, what was that again?
So, according to this argument, if you 'give' quota on economic basis to 'economically disadvantaged Brahmins', we wouldn't be seeing 'incapable people coming to the fore', affecting 'our national skills and efficiency'?
I think I am beginning to understand where all this opposition is coming from....It is also funny to read about ‘‘an attempt to divide the Hindu society’’...yeah, right! So, we are to gather that there was this beautifully united Hindu society,living happily and harmoniously, that is being divided TODAY?!
It was very amusing to watch the ruckus around the treatment of Shilpa Shetty in the TV reality show Celebrity Big Brother. Even more amusing is the reaction in India. I really wonder what would it be like to have a 'Big Brother' show in India (we have the desi-versions of so many foreign programs, anyway!) where you put people from different religions, regions and castes together - that would be real fun indeed! I am particularly keen to see so many pet-prejudices come to the fore...language-based, caste-based...etc.
Just as overt racism has long disappeared in the UK mainstream society, caste-based discrimination too has supposedly disappeared from Indian society. Just as everyone would like to show that racism has no place in modern society, so too in India, folks would pretend that caste-based discrimination doesn't exist and has no place - and this is true, to a large extent, at least in urban areas. But make no mistake - caste-affinity (to one's one caste) and caste-based discrimination in admissions to higher learning institutions, job selection, promotions, etc. are all quite prevalent, though not so overtly. Even when someone reaches a position based on his credentials, if his peers come to know that he is from a lower caste, there is likely to be some meaningful glances exchanged and some behind-the-back comments passed around...I have seen indirect comments directed against the former President of India, K.R. Narayanan being a neo-Buddhist (I have no idea where that term originated - obviously from upper caste Hindu society). The comment was made by a senior professor/researcher at a review meeting (before the meeting commenced, of course) in New Delhi at one of the ministries that funds various research grants. It was shocking to see the extent of prejudice, and more importantly, the assumption that everyone present in that room must be from an upper caste, and that everyone would share similar prejudices...But there is one major difference between racism and casteism, though...No one in their right minds would attempt to justify racism today, but on the contrary, you would find lots of so-called 'educated Hindus' trying to paint 'caste system' as just a well-intentioned social phenomenon that somehow went wrong and somehow got mixed up with the Hindu religion. It's true - Hindu religion is too big for anyone to be able to define it. However, those who would like to link mainstream Hinduism with the so-called Vedic tradition, are in effect justifying the caste system.
I thought I was the only one to make this connection - between the uproar over racism charges and the glossing over of caste-based discrimination. It turns out there are some who have thought about it as well - I came across a couple of letters to 'The Hindu' newspaper. Obviously upper caste folks reading this blog would think I must be crazy to talk about casteism as a form of racism...as they would obviously like to take a more 'enlightened' view of the whole caste system - that in ancient days it allowed for the smooth functioning of the society with division of labour among different groups... yeah, right, that would be fine as long as you didn't have to clean your own toilet, let alone other people's toilets...(I want to write more on this later - so check back again).
As someone who is against not just caste-based discrimination, but the evil of caste system itself, I find it distressing to follow the rather heated arguments around the 'reservation' issue where quotas to the underprivileged sections of society are involved. The latest issue involves the suggestion from the National Commission for Scheduled Castes that Dalits converting from Hinduism to Christianity or Islam need not be given reservation privileges as they no longer experience caste-based discrimination in their new religion.
This is one issue where I really DO NOT plan to take a stand - for reasons of my own: just as I am against caste-based discrimination, I am equally against fraudulent conversions to other religions, especially when lots of foreign money is involved. Yes, 'fraudulent' is a strong word, and it's probably unfair to the genuine missionaries doing genuine humanitarian work, along with religious conversions. But what I am against is the brainwashing of human mind with the idea that 'there is only ONE way to salvation' which also includes an indirect fear factor that goes something like 'or else, face eternal damnation'. In fact, I am against any brainwashing and any dogma that cannot be objectively verified (I know that's redundant - but I want to be clear on this one), no matter what religion it comes from.
Now, here are the things I wonder why no one is talking about:
Why is that no one talks about abolishing the caste system altogether - not just externally, but from the psyche itself? Scientifically it would be impossible to prove that people from one caste are superior or better suited to some professions, etc. - since environment, especially during childhood and adolescent days forms a major factor in the development of an individual. Socially, caste system has outlived any utility it once might have had (I am not at all convinced that it served any useful purpose at any point in time - on the contrary, I am truly convinced that this was the SINGLE biggest factor in weakening Indians and in neutralizing the genuine advantages Indians enjoyed - such as early development of various sciences and technologies). So why not get rid of it altogether and focus on genuine 'merit' of the individual - starting with one's character, knowledge and skills? I can understand the reluctance of upper caste folks not wanting to give up their identity (though it is actually a manifestation of weakness to attempt to derive an identity and sense of superiority from an imagined past, in my opinion). But what about the Dalits? OK, it's one thing to attempt to right the past wrongs and reservations do help level the playing field a bit - but once one generation of a Dalit family achieves a reasonable success socially and economically, they should have the confidence to opt out of any further reservations. This applies even more to the castes higher up in the hierarchy - the backward castes. Do they have the courage to opt out of the reservation system, so that more of their underprivileged brethren can try to come up in life? It is astounding that many Indians have not grasped this point - that one of the reasons that other Asian countries have been able to leapfrog in terms of development is because of the near-absence of anything resembling a caste system in their society today. May be I am wrong...may be Indians are moving in that direction...where caste becomes totally irrelevant...
Why is that many Hindus do not seem to realize that caste system could actually be an embarrassment when dealing with foreigners?
Are those who oppose conversion from Hinduism to other religions genuinely open to the idea of equality of all human beings? Have they seriously looked inside themselves? I think 'equality' would be a difficult concept to practice for many Indians...Personally I have come across silly prejudices arising out of differences in religion, caste, region (yes - North Vs. South), language (Hindi Vs. non-Hindi, Kannada Vs. Tamil, etc.)... of course, I have also come across world-class professionalism where these factors do not matter at all...where these seem to matter are in pockets of mediocrity, I should say...
OK, what provoked me to go off on this subject (once again!) was the letters to the editor on 'The Hindu' - yes, I do read them to get an idea where everyone is coming from. It is always interesting for me to link the name of the person (and thereby, to a large extent, one's background) with their opinion...
http://www.hindu.com/2007/01/27/stories/2007012707001001.htm
http://www.hindu.com/2007/01/29/stories/2007012902041002.htm
I have written before on the curse that is the caste 'system' in India. What is so outrageous is that caste-based discrimination is still practiced in Tamilnadu - one of the first places in India that woke up to fight this unacceptable 'practice'. The fight was led by 'Periyar' E.V.Ramasamy and was quite effective - up to a point. If you haven't noticed, most people in Tamilnadu (and many in the neighboring states as well) have long stopped using their 'traditional' family names (as they are usually caste-based), and instead use an initial - which is usually the first letter of one's father or husband. Today some people are starting to use their caste-name as their last name, such as 'Iyer'. But the irony in most caste-based discrimination in Tamilnadu is that it is practiced by non-Brahmins. This is the height of idiocy and lunacy. The Dravidian parties are busy with their own vote bank politics. To get rid of this system that has long lost whatever rationale it might have once had, I think Tamilnadu needs another Periyar and another clean-up job!
I was reminded of the situation because of the recent news reports of a 'wall' that was meant to separate people belonging to different castes in a village in Tamilnadu.